Daniil Glinka vs Giovanni Oradini Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

In the past half a year, Glinka has had a moderate success rate of winning second serve points, capturing about 49.28% of them. On the other hand, Oradini has slightly better odds with a 51.1% success rate. Interestingly, this stat is closely related to the accuracy of our match predictions. Looking at return game stats, Glinka has shown a similar trend. They have won approximately 49.48% of their opponent's second serve points, whereas Oradini has been slightly more successful, winning about 53.05%. When it comes to first serve returns, the numbers are quite close, with Glinka at 32.03% and Oradini at 31.97%. These return game stats provide valuable insight into determining the favorite in their head-to-head matchup. Let's not forget the pressure analysis. Glinka has managed to save around 54.61% of breakpoints in recent form, while Oradini has a higher success rate of 60.29%. This information can be quite useful when making in-game betting predictions. Taking a step back to evaluate their overall performance, Glinka has won about 59.09% of matches played in the past year, with a win-loss record of 39/27. On the other hand, Oradini has won about 54.72% of their matches, with a record of 29/24. These numbers give us a broad prediction overview for their head-to-head matchup. Considering their performance on different surfaces, Glinka has had the most success on indoor hard courts, winning 56% of matches played. However, their performance on clay has been less impressive, with a win percentage of 47%. As for Oradini, their best surface is hard court, where they have a win percentage of 63%, while their weakest surface is indoor hard court, with a win percentage of 57%. When it comes to player level, both Glinka and Oradini have primarily played in the Future/Satellite/ITF tournaments. Glinka has won about 66.67% of matches in this category, while Oradini has a slightly lower win percentage of 65.71%. It's important to note that these predictions are relative to the level of the tournaments they have been participating in. In terms of their head-to-head matches, they have faced each other once before, with Glinka failing to secure a victory, while Oradini emerged triumphant. They have played a total of three sets, with Glinka winning one and Oradini winning two. The most recent match between them took place at the M 25 Trento, where Oradini claimed victory with a score of 4-6, 7-6(5), 6-4. On average, their head-to-head matches have lasted around 2 hours and 49 minutes. If this match goes to a deciding set, it's worth noting that Glinka has yet to secure a win in such situations, while Oradini has emerged victorious once. This information can be crucial in predicting the outcome if the match goes the distance. When it comes to extreme pressure situations, they have played one tiebreak against each other, with Oradini emerging as the winner. This statistic gives us an interesting insight into their ability to handle high-stakes moments. Examining the quality of their opponents, Glinka has faced players with an average ranking of 412.32 in the past year, while Oradini has had slightly tougher competition, with an average ranking of 390.62. Considering the level of opponents faced can provide us with a better understanding of their performances. Looking specifically at deciding set performance against all players, Glinka has won around 45% of deciding sets in the past year, while Oradini has a higher success rate of 56% in all matches played on tour. This information becomes particularly relevant if the match reaches a deciding set. Current event statistics also hold valuable information for predicting the outcome of a match. While past performance is important, we should also consider how players are currently performing in the event. It's crucial to take into account any patterns or trends that may arise during the course of the tournament. Additionally, certain players may excel in specific events, so this should be taken into consideration when making predictions. Lastly, let's take a look at break point conversion rates. In recent form, Glinka has had a conversion rate of approximately 35.07% on breakpoint opportunities, while Oradini has been more successful with a conversion rate of 47.2%. These stats can be particularly helpful in providing in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.